On my mind the past week has been the judgment passed on Friday 22nd
November 2013, where former Inktech managing director Mathews Mohan was sentenced
to death by hanging for the murder of Cyclone Hardware director Sajid Itowala
in 2009. I am quite saddened that in this day we still have such laws that
allow one human being to declare that another be killed. I am reminded of the
words of late English poet John Donne; "any man's death diminishes me, because
I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell
tolls; it tolls for thee.”
The existence of the death penalty in our society raises several
questions regarding the basis of the justice system. Do we seek to establish
our justice systems out of a desire for rehabilitation, or out of a desire for retribution?
Is capital punishment the best way to deter would be offenders? Is the principle
of this legislation one of equivalency, reprisal or justice? Is this piece of
legislation relevant today? I don’t have the answers to all the questions I
have raised above, but the words of Nelson Mandela can guide; “You
will achieve more in this world through acts of mercy than you will through
acts of retribution.”
Our society's indignation, it seems, is more overwrought by legal wrong than conscious wrong. There should be no room for such archaic laws in the 21st century. In
the old testament of the Christian holy book, the phrase "An eye for an
eye and a tooth for a tooth" gives a lucid picture of how conflict between
two parties was handled. However, precisely two thousand forty six years ago
when Jesus Christ descended to earth by birth through the Virgin Mary, this system
of justice was challenged. In speaking to the people of Israel, Jesus said that
we should love even our enemies and do good to them. Jesus Christ was not the
first to challenge this type of justice system of eye for an eye. It was first
challenged in the Old Testament way before Jesus was born on earth. Why should
we uphold it today?
The absurdity of this ‘piece of legislation’ is that I haven’t
heard anyone actually get hanged in Zambia for a long time even though many
continue getting sentenced to death. Everyone on death row just waits for the
day when the Tuberculosis or whatever disease they get infected with while in
jail eventually does kill them. This, I believe, is more angst to the family of
such a person. In this case the family is also subjected to punishment all
because of one person’s debauchery. Yet, there is no credible evidence that the
death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment or
life sentences.
Going by the testimonies that the court heard in the Mohan case,
the murder of Sajid was really gruesome and the responsible person(s) must face
the full wrath of the law. In saying so I am talking of a life sentence or ‘two
life sentences’ (which I don’t understand, –If you died, would you be jailed for
life in your next life?). A life sentence is more appropriate.
I am cognizant of the fact that the issue of Capital punishment was brought up in the Mungo’mba draft constitution but a size-able number of Zambians rejected it. It would appear like a size-able number of Zambians still want “an eye for an eye”, or would rejoice at taking away the life of another simply because they participated in taking someone else’s life. Why must the chain end there? Even he who has ordered the execution must then also be subjected to the same standard and be executed for participating in the killing of another human and so on until the killing chain wipes everyone off the face of the earth.
I am cognizant of the fact that the issue of Capital punishment was brought up in the Mungo’mba draft constitution but a size-able number of Zambians rejected it. It would appear like a size-able number of Zambians still want “an eye for an eye”, or would rejoice at taking away the life of another simply because they participated in taking someone else’s life. Why must the chain end there? Even he who has ordered the execution must then also be subjected to the same standard and be executed for participating in the killing of another human and so on until the killing chain wipes everyone off the face of the earth.
Surprisingly, the most postulated reason Zambia still keeps the death
penalty is that the USA still upholds it. Are we supposed to do everything the
USA does? Ultimately, the moral question surrounding capital punishment has
less to do with whether those convicted of violent crime deserve to die than
with whether government deserves to kill those whom it has imprisoned.
By the way, is “Death by hanging” literary death by hanging? It couldn't be hanging; even the infamous Timothy McVeigh was killed by lethal
injection, who takes pride in hanging another human.
No comments:
Post a Comment