The past week I have seen and heard complaints mainly from Africans, regarding the western media’s coverage of the Paris terrorist attacks. The main complaint is
that while there are attacks in other parts of the world every day, those are
not widely covered hence giving the impression that it is only European and
American lives that matter. The accusation was also thrown at Facebook for reacting
to the Paris attacks by activating a feature that made people change their
profile picture shaded by the French flag while this never happens anywhere
else.
Some Zambians are up in arms against their fellows who have shown
solidarity with the French people and accusing them of all sorts of things
ranging from worshipers of colonialists to hypocrites who do not do the same
when fellow Africans are killed.
My view… my thoughts…
My take is simply that everyone has the liberty to mourn, show
solidarity with whoever they wish. This accusation that the western media is
giving too much coverage to events in Europe and Americas at the expense of
other places is baseless really. Why do I say so?, BBC is a European media
house with headquarters just across Paris to the English Channel. These are
their neighbours, and relatives for God’s sake. BBC will run with
that story for days and I will not find any offence in that.
The same goes for CNN. France has been a big ally of America and I
assume the Americans feel closer to the French people than they do say the
people of Chad or Gambia. So CNN will cover the story in Paris as much. These
are their stories. I know for sure that AlJazeera does cover a lot of stories
from the Middle East and generally the Arab world, these are also their
stories. I also know that on Thursday 12th November there was also a
terrorist attack in Beirut, Lebanon and this was widely covered by Aljazeera
and many other news stations in the region even way after the Friday November
13 attacks in Paris.
In short, we should not cry for BBC, CNN or whoever to cover our
stories here in Africa as much as they do their own stories. It won’t happen. Blood is thicker
than water. Nothing stops us from covering our own stories for days on end.
Nothing stops us Africans to design a social media platform the type of Facebook
where we will change our profile pictures to the green and white flag of
Nigeria every time Boko Haram strike.
South Africa has E-NCA channel and they do cover a lot of the
African stories and of course they will go days on end to cover their own South
African stories. I watch E-NCA channel quite a lot and I know at times it
bothers my office mate who asks if we live in South Africa for us to be
watching South African news all the time. Well, I do change to watch TV2 News
which comes every two hours or so, particularly watching the 10hrs and 12 hours
news. Besides I relate to stories from South Africa more than I do stories from
say Atlanta Georgia. Hence I watch more of E-NCA than I do CNN or BBC.
Recently the E-NCA channel has been covering the #feesmustfall
student protests and I have the feeling this is what is also going on in my
country so it is closer to home. It’s just last year when a student committed
suicide at the University of Zambia after being denied a bursary and the
students rioted. That life is more important to us Zambians than it should be
to CNN so I won’t stress if CNN doesn’t cover that. ZNBC and all the other media
outlets should be in the fore-front to cover that. This is how we will make our
stories heard (edit to read funerals too). CNN will be busy covering stories
closer to Atlanta and other places from within America and their allies.
The irony in all these complaints against CNN, BBC, SKY and Facebook
giving too much attention to the Paris terrorist attack is that, there have
been no complaints against the rumour (I haven’t heard it on the news
yet, except social media) that Kenneth Maduma has been fired from ZNBC for
airing a clip of the police brutally beating up Copperbelt University students
who on independence day protested against the continued closure of CBU. It is
Ironic that we want to censor our own stories but we want the west to cover our
stories. Which stories do we want them to cover? We have hidden our stories.
On 14 January 2010 the Zambia police shot at a group of youths who
had gathered in Mongu to be enlightened on the ever contentious issue of the
Barotse 1964 agreement. I can say that story was also censored except the post
newspaper that gave it a lot of coverage. These are our stories. Let’s tell them. The four or
five lives we lost in Mongu are important too. Let’s ask questions why these
un-armed youth were shot at. Let’s ask what happened to the officers who pulled
the respective Kalashnikov triggers. Let’s ask what happened to the
person that ordered the police to carry live ammunition to a gathering of
youths irrespective of the motive of their gathering.
Alas we have shelved our stories and even censored them, yet we
want to climb the mountain top and question BBC for ‘too much’ coverage of an attack in
Paris. It is preposterous. Clearly those that run our media houses and their minions
want to use them as propaganda machines and these people are void of any morality
and elementary ethics that are the bedrock of professional journalism. This is
why our stories are not told. It is not the fault of the BBC.
The other week social media was at it again blaming BBC and
Bloomberg for the way they covered the National day for prayer fasting &
reconciliation. The accusation came after the respective international media
organisations reported that the Zambian government had failed to deal with the
local currency which had been in free fall and thus decided to seek divine
intervention instead.
Well, we didn’t need the BBC to
spell to us what the prayers were all about. It is what the government leaders
said. Even though the theme of the prayer day had reconciliation somewhere in
the sentence, reconciliation itself was highly conspicuous by its absence before,
during and after the prayers. What we were all told was prayers for the
currency and the economy. Regrettably some sections of our society chose to
disparage the BBC and Bloomberg for their accurate reporting. We can go ahead and promote the kind of copy and
paste journalism that we do best in Africa and more so in Zambia, but we
shouldn’t blame those that report as they see things without any
influence.
We should not always find other people to blame when we haven’t done what we are supposed
to do ourselves. Clearly we need to learn to mourn our own. Nobody will mourn
us if we don’t mourn ourselves and our loved ones. We can’t always blame other
people when we haven’t done our part.
The simple rule of life should be that once you bear children you
should be responsible for their welfare and nobody else. Of course in Africa
the main argument against this is that we should embrace the extended family. I
agree because I am a product of the extended family system. However, my simple
contention is that the extended family system should apply bringing us together
and not help us duck our responsibilities. For instance, one cannot bear eight
children and expect the extended family system to take over the welfare of
those children.
On the other hand, if one has 12 children that one is taking care
of and meeting all their needs, and such a person dies, then and only then, the
time the extended family should come into play. I know my stance may not be a
popular position to take considering the circumstances of our relationships in
Africa and our expectations of the extended family system. However, as long as
we live, we should be responsible for our own children. We shouldn’t expect too much from
others. When someone lends a helping hand to us in whatever form, we should be
thankful but should also know that they are not obliged to give us that helping
hand.
We are responsible for our own units starting with immediate family and
then the bigger extended family of friends and neighbours, all the way to a
nation and extending to the continent and finally the entire globe and all of
humanity.
In short, we should do more for ourselves before we expect other
people to do something for us. This attitude must extend to sad situations like
death and funerals. The one who is in mourning is the one who has lost a loved
one. If the neighbor joins us in mourning, then we should appreciate their
action to mourn with us and consoling us. If they don’t mourn and console us,
there should be no offence taken.