“Dr Livingstone, I presume?”
The famous words of Welsh born, American journalist and explorer
Sir Henry Morton Stanley.
In November 1871 he found a sick David Livingstone at Lake Tanganyika
(Livingstone's last known location) greeting him with the famous words. That
encounter happened more than 125 years before the first time I read about it.
In the same vein, when Ronald Reagan was president of the USA, I may have been
a little too young to follow anything that was happening thousands of miles
away. Therefore, any little information about Reagan and his presidency which I
have come across over the years, is mostly from books and in some instances
TV documentaries.
One interesting book about the Reagan presidency I have
read is Kitty Kelley's Nancy
Reagan: The Unauthorized Biography. In her book, Ms Kelley makes some
sensational claims which she states are from 1,002 interviews with estranged Reagan family members,
alienated former staff members and Reagan friends and loyalists. My pick of the
many allegations in the book is the suggestion that, Nancy Reagan and not
Ronald Reagan, was in charge of the White House for the most part of the Reagan
presidency.
This comes to the question of the roles of first
a first lady, what are they? “While there is freedom in how the first lady
elects to fulfill her office, there are also many historic precedents that she
is expected to follow. Perhaps the most imperative function she serves is White
House hostess. The early first ladies, like Martha Washington, Abigail Adams
and Dolley Madison, set a careful tone for this role. Given the United States'
separation from England's monarchical traditions, it was important that the
first lady be a woman of the people -- but for the sake of being taken
seriously by other nations, she had to imbue the role with some queenly
prestige” [source: National First Ladies
Library].
“The first lady is an
international celebrity, and she can leverage her title to serve as an advocate
for social issues. That's why the first lady traditionally has a platform (or
pet project, as some historians call it) for her term in office. Whether it's
animal rights (Florence Harding), environmental beautification (Claudia
"Lady Bird" Johnson) or literacy (Barbara Bush), the first lady's
influential advocacy of her chosen cause will typically continue even after her
term in Washington ends.
In the latter half of the
20th century, the first lady espoused more political roles, acting as a
campaigner for her husband and drawing up support for his policies. In many
instances, she acts as the president's informal adviser.” http://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/first-lady1.htm
In the Zambian context, while I may not have been
old enough to remember the activities of Betty Kaunda, I do remember Vera
Chiluba’s Hope Foundation social activities, Maureen Mwanawasa’s Community
Initiative (MMCI), Thandiwe Banda and Dr Christine Kaseba have both engaged in
various health and education initiatives.
To draw comparisons to Nancy Reagan, Maureen
Mwanawasa was at times rumored to have had a lot of influence on government
during Mwanawasa’s second term of office. The rumor was further
fueled when some people within MMD endorsed Maureen as the successor to her
husband. Maureen did not herself participate in active politics despite all the
endorsements that went round. The irony of it all is
that even after Levy Patrick Mwanawasa’s death, the story has not blurred away.
This is despite the fact the Maureen Mwanawasa has lived life after state house
largely as a private citizen. Make no mistake about it; Maureen is highly
qualified to run for the highest office in Zambia. She
just hasn't involved herself in active politics. Probably she was
never active.
The question still remains, what is the role of a first lady?
Maybe rephrased, what is the role of the spouse to the head of state?
Perhaps one nation where it might be argued that the first lady
had a BIG hand in the running of the state is Argentina. This is so because
during the reign of Néstor Kirchner, it was widely rumored in some circles that
first lady Cristina Fernández de Kirchner was actually the one calling the
shots in that country. The rumors gained some pockets of merit when after just
one term, Néstor Kirchner stepped down and his wife Cristina Fernández de
Kirchner ran for president and is still the incumbent now in her second term.
It is widely expected that the head of state’s spouse might
sporadically weigh in on personnel issues such as presidential appointments,
but they would never meddle in policy. Are we expecting heads of states to be
on a higher moral ground than the rest of humanity in keeping that rule? If the
rule exists at all! Are couples in political office expected to only share
romantic passions behind closed doors without a tinge of anything work related?
To what extent does a spouse get involved?
In her book, Kitty Kelley affirms that Nancy Reagan, or "Mrs.
President," as her staffers called her, not only ruled the White House,
but with an iron fist. When
President Ronald Reagan was given his agenda for his first meeting in Geneva
with Mikhail S. Gorbachev, Ms. Kelley recounts, he asked his aides, "Have
you shown this to Nancy?"
"No, sir," they replied.
"Well, get back to
me after she's passed on it," he told them.
Brilliant brilliant.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Vincent!
DeleteInteresting Patrice and thought provoking. There are some that have called for the specification of the first lady's role by enshrining it in the constitution so that there is no ambiguity and that it can be funded from the nation's coffers. I am yet to look at the new draft constitution to see whether that has happened.
ReplyDeleteThe truth is it is very difficult if not impossible to prescribe a role for first ladies, let alone separate them from the activities of their husbands.
Keith,
DeleteThought provoking indeed. It is extremely difficulty to prescribe the role of a first lady.
With or without the constitutionally enshrined office of the first lady, a first lady still holds some inert or indolent power. However, it wouldn't be wise to make the role a constitutional one. This would put a lot of power in the first lady and make other 'ceremonial positions' in government i.e role of Veep highly irrelevant. The first lady is the one ever at the side of a president.